Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnSwitzerlandchCypruscyNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | lu | ro | md | us-mt | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper only | Paper only | Paper + scan | Paper only | |
| Overall | 20.8% | 24.8% | 32.3% | 59.0% | 29.6% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 5.9% | 14.7% | 29.4% | 50.0% | 14.7% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 37.0% | 53.6% | 28.6% | 66.1% | 42.9% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 11.1% | 8.3% | 61.1% | 88.9% | 58.3% |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 36.4% | 40.9% | 63.6% | 81.8% | 62.7% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 41.7% | 41.7% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 8.3% |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 15.1% | 13.2% | 20.8% | 44.3% | 13.2% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | lu | ro | md | us-mt | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Commission | 0% | 20% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
| Funding | 0% | 0% | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| Staff Training | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 0% |
| Vendor Oversight | 0% | 0% | 0% | 83% | 17% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | lu | ro | md | us-mt | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration | 0% | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| Eligibility | 20% | 60% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| Identification | 40% | 70% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
| Registration | 71% | 57% | 43% | 79% | 57% |
| Roll Integrity | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| Voter Assistance | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| Voting Methods | 20% | 50% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | lu | ro | md | us-mt | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 0% | 0% | 67% | 100% | 17% |
| Disclosure | 0% | 0% | 90% | 90% | 70% |
| Enforcement | 50% | 38% | 25% | 88% | 63% |
| Foreign Source | 0% | 0% | 63% | 100% | 75% |
| Traceability | 0% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | lu | ro | md | us-mt | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contest | 40% | 60% | 80% | 100% | 80% |
| Recount | 13% | 0% | 25% | 88% | 60% |
| Timing | 75% | 75% | 100% | 25% | 25% |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | lu | ro | md | us-mt | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 25% | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| Candidate | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% |
| Notification | 50% | 25% | 0% | 75% | 25% |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | lu | ro | md | us-mt | au |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 13% | 13% | 13% | 31% | 0% |
| Custody Hardware | 25% | 25% | 25% | 56% | 38% |
| Post Election Audit | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 11% |
| Software Verifiability | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11% | 0% |
| Transparency Observation | 13% | 0% | 63% | 38% | 0% |
| Vendor Independence | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 0% |
| Voter Access | 57% | 57% | 43% | 100% | 43% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.