Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | lu | us | is | ro | ca | mg | us-az | us-il | kp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Aggregate | Paper only | Paper only | Paper only | Paper only | Paper + scan | Paper + scan | Paper only | |
| Overall | 20.8% | 32.0% | 25.6% | 24.8% | 32.3% | 22.6% | 37.2% | 38.7% | 4.3% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 5.9% | 41.2% | 14.7% | 14.7% | 26.5% | 14.7% | 35.3% | 38.2% | 18.2% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 37.0% | 51.8% | 30.4% | 53.6% | 39.3% | 30.4% | 50.0% | 60.7% | 4.0% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 11.1% | 63.9% | 61.1% | 8.3% | 44.4% | 19.4% | 58.3% | 38.9% | — |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 36.4% | 9.1% | 36.4% | 40.9% | 81.8% | 27.3% | 45.5% | 54.5% | 0.0% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 41.7% | 41.7% | 33.3% | 41.7% | 23.3% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 25.0% | — |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 15.1% | 11.3% | 11.3% | 13.2% | 17.0% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 25.5% | 1.9% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | lu | us | is | ro | ca | mg | us-az | us-il | kp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 25% | 50% | 0% |
| Commission | 0% | 60% | 30% | 20% | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| Funding | 0% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
| Staff Training | 0% | 17% | 0% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 33% | 50% | — |
| Vendor Oversight | 0% | 67% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | lu | us | is | ro | ca | mg | us-az | us-il | kp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% |
| Eligibility | 20% | 20% | 20% | 60% | 0% | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| Identification | 40% | 40% | 20% | 70% | 80% | 40% | 60% | 40% | 0% |
| Registration | 71% | 64% | 43% | 57% | 43% | 64% | 71% | 79% | 0% |
| Roll Integrity | 0% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Voter Assistance | 33% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| Voting Methods | 20% | 42% | 33% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | lu | us | is | ro | ca | mg | us-az | us-il | kp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 0% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 67% | 17% | 67% | 83% | — |
| Disclosure | 0% | 60% | 70% | 0% | 50% | 30% | 90% | 40% | — |
| Enforcement | 50% | 88% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 75% | 38% | — |
| Foreign Source | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 25% | — |
| Traceability | 0% | 50% | 75% | 0% | 25% | 25% | 50% | 0% | — |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | lu | us | is | ro | ca | mg | us-az | us-il | kp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contest | 40% | 0% | 70% | 60% | 80% | 50% | 20% | 60% | 0% |
| Recount | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 88% | 50% | — |
| Timing | 75% | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% | — |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | lu | us | is | ro | ca | mg | us-az | us-il | kp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 0% | — |
| Candidate | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% | 50% | 25% | — |
| Notification | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 70% | 50% | 75% | 50% | — |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | lu | us | is | ro | ca | mg | us-az | us-il | kp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 19% | 0% |
| Custody Hardware | 25% | 0% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 38% | 31% | 0% |
| Post Election Audit | 0% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 22% | 11% | 33% | 17% | 0% |
| Software Verifiability | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 0% |
| Transparency Observation | 13% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 13% | 31% | 0% |
| Vendor Independence | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 50% | 0% |
| Voter Access | 57% | 43% | 29% | 57% | 57% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 14% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.