Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnSwitzerlandchCypruscyNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | nl | lv | gr | mt | us-oh | us-me | us-ia | bg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper only | Paper only | MixedPaper + scanBMDTouchscreen + paper | Paper + scan | Paper + scan | Touchscreen + paper | ||
| Overall | 28.6% | 40.2% | 26.3% | 24.0% | 48.9% | 33.2% | 36.8% | 27.8% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 17.6% | 35.3% | 14.7% | 5.9% | 23.5% | 23.5% | 41.2% | 23.5% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 28.6% | 46.4% | 46.4% | 23.1% | 69.6% | 29.6% | 55.4% | 44.6% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 47.2% | 72.2% | 55.6% | 55.6% | 61.1% | 63.9% | 44.4% | 25.0% |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 54.5% | 68.2% | 27.3% | 17.3% | 72.7% | 31.8% | 22.7% | 27.3% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 41.7% | 41.7% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 58.3% | 30.0% | 33.3% | 33.3% |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 18.9% | 21.7% | 8.5% | 20.8% | 35.8% | 28.3% | 26.4% | 20.8% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | nl | lv | gr | mt | us-oh | us-me | us-ia | bg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 50% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 75% | 25% |
| Commission | 0% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| Funding | 0% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Staff Training | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Vendor Oversight | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 50% | 33% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | nl | lv | gr | mt | us-oh | us-me | us-ia | bg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Eligibility | 40% | 80% | 20% | 20% | 90% | 0% | 40% | 0% |
| Identification | 30% | 30% | 40% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| Registration | 43% | 21% | 79% | 43% | 79% | 71% | 71% | 57% |
| Roll Integrity | 0% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| Voter Assistance | 0% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% |
| Voting Methods | 25% | 67% | 42% | 38% | 58% | 20% | 58% | 33% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | nl | lv | gr | mt | us-oh | us-me | us-ia | bg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 67% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 0% |
| Disclosure | 50% | 80% | 60% | 80% | 100% | 80% | 60% | 30% |
| Enforcement | 50% | 38% | 50% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
| Foreign Source | 0% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
| Traceability | 100% | 75% | 100% | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | nl | lv | gr | mt | us-oh | us-me | us-ia | bg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contest | 70% | 80% | 40% | 30% | 60% | 0% | 0% | 40% |
| Recount | 50% | 75% | 0% | 10% | 100% | 50% | 38% | 0% |
| Timing | 25% | 25% | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% | 50% | 50% |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | nl | lv | gr | mt | us-oh | us-me | us-ia | bg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 15% | 0% | 0% |
| Candidate | 75% | 50% | 25% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Notification | 25% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | nl | lv | gr | mt | us-oh | us-me | us-ia | bg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 13% | 25% | 6% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 13% | 13% |
| Custody Hardware | 0% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 50% | 63% | 63% | 25% |
| Post Election Audit | 33% | 0% | 0% | 22% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 0% |
| Software Verifiability | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| Transparency Observation | 38% | 44% | 13% | 38% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 13% |
| Vendor Independence | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 0% |
| Voter Access | 43% | 57% | 29% | 43% | 57% | 29% | 43% | 57% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.