Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnSwitzerlandchCypruscyNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | us-il | ee | us-ct | au | us-wi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper + scan | Paper only | Paper + scan | Paper only | Paper + scan |
| Overall | 38.7% | 59.4% | 49.6% | 29.6% | 37.6% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 38.2% | 47.1% | 47.1% | 14.7% | 26.5% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 60.7% | 60.7% | 66.1% | 42.9% | 17.9% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 38.9% | 80.6% | 61.1% | 58.3% | 5.6% |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 54.5% | 81.8% | 63.6% | 62.7% | 59.1% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 25.0% | 33.3% | 75.0% | 8.3% | 50.0% |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 25.5% | 53.8% | 32.1% | 13.2% | 56.6% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | us-il | ee | us-ct | au | us-wi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Commission | 60% | 70% | 60% | 20% | 30% |
| Funding | 0% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
| Staff Training | 50% | 17% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| Vendor Oversight | 33% | 33% | 67% | 17% | 33% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | us-il | ee | us-ct | au | us-wi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Eligibility | 60% | 90% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
| Identification | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% |
| Registration | 79% | 57% | 86% | 57% | 0% |
| Roll Integrity | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Voter Assistance | 67% | 33% | 67% | 67% | 33% |
| Voting Methods | 50% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 33% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | us-il | ee | us-ct | au | us-wi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 83% | 100% | 100% | 17% | 0% |
| Disclosure | 40% | 80% | 40% | 70% | 0% |
| Enforcement | 38% | 75% | 75% | 63% | 25% |
| Foreign Source | 25% | 75% | 50% | 75% | 0% |
| Traceability | 0% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | us-il | ee | us-ct | au | us-wi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contest | 60% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 30% |
| Recount | 50% | 75% | 63% | 60% | 100% |
| Timing | 50% | 100% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | us-il | ee | us-ct | au | us-wi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 0% | 25% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Candidate | 25% | 25% | 75% | 0% | 50% |
| Notification | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | us-il | ee | us-ct | au | us-wi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 19% | 75% | 13% | 0% | 31% |
| Custody Hardware | 31% | 31% | 38% | 38% | 50% |
| Post Election Audit | 17% | 44% | 67% | 11% | 50% |
| Software Verifiability | 17% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 56% |
| Transparency Observation | 31% | 75% | 50% | 0% | 75% |
| Vendor Independence | 50% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 75% |
| Voter Access | 29% | 71% | 43% | 43% | 71% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.