Compare jurisdictions
Head-to-head methodology and dimension scores. Pick up to all 6 jurisdictions from the chips below.
Selected
EstoniaeeMontanaus-mtFloridaus-flKentuckyus-kyTexasus-txNew Yorkus-nyConnecticutus-ctGeorgiaus-gaOhious-ohCaliforniaus-caNorth Dakotaus-ndWashingtonus-waColoradous-coSouth Dakotaus-sdSwedenseNorwaynoVirginiaus-vaMinnesotaus-mnWest Virginiaus-wvDenmarkdkAlabamaus-alMarylandus-mdLatvialvNew Mexicous-nmIndianaus-inPennsylvaniaus-paArkansasus-arTennesseeus-tnIllinoisus-ilFinlandfiLouisianaus-laRhode Islandus-riSouth Carolinaus-scWisconsinus-wiArizonaus-azDelawareus-deIowaus-iaMichiganus-miAlaskaus-akNew Hampshireus-nhNebraskaus-neMexicomxLithuanialtVermontus-vtNevadaus-nvUtahus-utOregonus-orKansasus-ksMissourius-moTurkeytrNorth Carolinaus-ncMassachusettsus-maMaineus-meIdahous-idMoldovamdRussiaruCanadacaUnited StatesusOklahomaus-okGermanydeUkraineuaAustraliaauAustriaatSerbiasrArgentinaarNetherlandsnlFrancefrBulgariabgSpainesPortugalptPolandplHawaiius-hiGreecegrIcelandisWyomingus-wyMississippius-msUnited KingdomgbRomaniaroMaltamtIrelandieArmeniaamNew Jerseyus-njBrazilbrCroatiahrBelgiumbeMadagascarmgGeorgiageLuxembourgluGreenlandglKazakhstankzBelarusbyCzechiaczSouth AfricazaChinacnNorth Koreakp
Methodology Radar (overlay)
Overall
| Methodology | us-tn | ca | lv | gl | no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting method | Paper + scan | Paper only | Paper only | Paper only | Paper only |
| Overall | 39.1% | 32.3% | 40.2% | 20.7% | 42.9% |
| EAdI Election Administration Index | 23.5% | 26.5% | 35.3% | 11.8% | 35.3% |
| EAI Electoral Access Index | 55.4% | 39.3% | 46.4% | 39.3% | 60.7% |
| ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index | 44.4% | 44.4% | 72.2% | 11.1% | 19.4% |
| EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index | 31.8% | 81.8% | 68.2% | 31.8% | 81.8% |
| EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index | 50.0% | 23.3% | 41.7% | 16.7% | 58.3% |
| EII Election Integrity Index | 34.0% | 17.0% | 21.7% | 15.1% | 34.0% |
Dimensions (per methodology)
EAdI Election Administration Index
| Dimension | us-tn | ca | lv | gl | no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accountability | 0% | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| Commission | 20% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| Funding | 0% | 13% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
| Staff Training | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| Vendor Oversight | 67% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 67% |
EAI Electoral Access Index
| Dimension | us-tn | ca | lv | gl | no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration | 50% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Eligibility | 40% | 0% | 80% | 20% | 40% |
| Identification | 40% | 80% | 30% | 20% | 60% |
| Registration | 71% | 43% | 21% | 64% | 93% |
| Roll Integrity | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Voter Assistance | 67% | 67% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| Voting Methods | 67% | 33% | 67% | 42% | 58% |
ECI Election Campaign-Finance Index
| Dimension | us-tn | ca | lv | gl | no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributions | 33% | 67% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Disclosure | 60% | 50% | 80% | 0% | 0% |
| Enforcement | 50% | 25% | 38% | 50% | 75% |
| Foreign Source | 0% | 50% | 75% | 0% | 0% |
| Traceability | 100% | 25% | 75% | 0% | 25% |
EDRI Election Dispute Resolution Index
| Dimension | us-tn | ca | lv | gl | no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contest | 60% | 80% | 80% | 40% | 100% |
| Recount | 13% | 100% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| Timing | 0% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 100% |
EVCI Election Voter-Confidence Index
| Dimension | us-tn | ca | lv | gl | no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballot Info | 25% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| Candidate | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| Notification | 75% | 70% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
EII Election Integrity Index
| Dimension | us-tn | ca | lv | gl | no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizen Verifiability | 13% | 13% | 25% | 13% | 31% |
| Custody Hardware | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 38% |
| Post Election Audit | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 56% |
| Software Verifiability | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
| Transparency Observation | 13% | 0% | 44% | 25% | 56% |
| Vendor Independence | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Voter Access | 57% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 29% |
Phase 3 will replace these dense tables with overlaid radar charts and a datapoint heatmap.