from denial of allegations in civil trial; admissibility of testimony.
Sec. 159q.
(1) At the civil in rem forfeiture proceeding, the court shall act as trier of fact. The
prosecuting agency has the burden of proving both of the following by clear and convincing
evidence:
(a) The property is subject to civil in rem forfeiture under section 159m.
(b) The person claiming an ownership interest in the property had prior actual knowledge of
the commission of an offense listed in the definition of racketeering.
(2) At the civil in rem forfeiture proceeding, the person claiming an ownership interest in
the property has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he or she
served notice of the commission of the crime upon an appropriate law enforcement agency.
(3) At the civil in rem forfeiture proceeding, the prosecuting agency has the burden of
proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a person claiming a security interest in the
property or a person claiming an interest as a land contract vendor had prior actual knowledge
of the commission of the racketeering activity.
(4) If the prosecuting agency fails to meet the burden of proof under subsection (1), or if the
person claiming an ownership interest in the property meets his or her burden of proof under
subsection (2), the property shall be returned to the owner within 28 days after a written order
Michigan Compiled Laws Complete Through PA 91 of 2026
Rendered Sunday, September 6, 2026 Page 133 of 465 Courtesy of legislature.mi.gov
is entered to return the property, unless an appellate court stays the order. In addition, the
prosecuting agency shall reimburse the owner for reasonable attorney fees and damages
related to towing costs, storage fees and expenses, foreclosure costs, and other similar
expenses.
(5) If the prosecuting agency meets the burden of proof under subsection (1) and the person
claiming an ownership interest in the property does not meet the burden of proof under
subsection (2), the property shall be disposed of pursuant to section 159r.
(6) Within 7 days after personal property is returned to the owner, or a lien filed against real
property or a motor vehicle is discharged, the prosecuting agency that gave notice of the
seizure of the property and the intent to forfeit and dispose of the property pursuant to section
159o shall give notice to the persons who received notice pursuant to section 159o that the
property has been returned to the owner or that the lien has been discharged.
(7) The notice required under subsection (6) shall be a written notice delivered to the person
or sent to the person by certified mail. If the name and address of the person are not
reasonably ascertainable or delivery of the notice cannot reasonably be accomplished, the
notice shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the
personal property was seized or the real property is located for 10 successive publishing days.
(8) A defendant convicted in a criminal proceeding is estopped from subsequently denying
in a civil action the essential allegations of the criminal offense of which he or she was
convicted.
(9) The testimony of a person at a civil in rem forfeiture proceeding held under this chapter
is not admissible against him or her, except for the purpose of impeachment, in a criminal
proceeding other than a criminal prosecution for perjury. The testimony of a person at a civil
in rem forfeiture proceeding held under this chapter does not waive the person's constitutional
right against self-incrimination.§ 750.159qBurden of proof; evidence; return or disposal of property; notice; estoppel
en · 3,759 chars · active
Primary source. The text above is the canonical statute body as it appears in this revision of the atlas. Verify against the official gazette before quoting in litigation or formal advice. Spot an error? Suggest a correction.