Cypruseai-v0

EAIElectoral Access Index

How accessible is the franchise under codified procedure?

Access7.1%2/28 · 25 datapoints · 7 dimensionsCompare across jurisdictions →

Dimensions

Administration0.0%
0/1 · 1 datapoint
Eligibility20.0%
1/5 · 3 datapoints
Identification20.0%
1/5 · 5 datapoints
Registration0.0%
0/7 · 6 datapoints
Roll Integrity0.0%
0/1 · 1 datapoint
Voter Assistance0.0%
0/3 · 3 datapoints
Voting Methods0.0%
0/6 · 6 datapoints

Administration

0.0% · 0/1
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
ADMIN.1Election administration independenceIs the election administration body's independence (appointment by multiple branches, fixed terms, balanced political composition) codified in statute or constitution?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 65B is a COVID-19 voting procedure provision that addresses how COVID-positive voters may cast ballots remotely. It does not address the structural independence, appointment mechanism, term length, or political composition of any election administration body. The section mentions the 'General Electoral Officer' (Γενικός Έφορος Εκλογής) and electoral officers (Έφοροι) as administrative actors but contains no statutory codification of their independence, appointment process, or balanced composition.

§ view source
2026-06-17

Eligibility

20.0% · 1/5
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
ELIG.1Age and residency in constitutionAre the minimum age and residency requirements for voting set in the constitution (rather than statute alone)?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 48 concerns campaign finance and candidate expenses, not voter eligibility, age, or residency requirements. It contains no provisions addressing minimum voting age or residency qualifications for voters. This section is entirely outside the scope of the criterion being evaluated.

§ view source
2026-06-17
ELIG.2Disqualification frameworkIf voters can be disqualified (felony, mental incompetence), are the criteria and the duration codified in statute, with a defined restoration procedure?1/333.3%

The section provides statutory codification of disqualification criteria (unlawful electoral conduct) and maximum duration (seven years), satisfying the enumeration and statutory-grounding requirement. However, the statute specifies only the maximum period during which courts *may* impose disqualification; it contains no defined restoration procedure—no automatic restoration mechanism, no reinstatement application process, and no appeal pathway for restoring eligibility after disqualification expires. This is a score of 1: statute-based disqualification without statutory restoration pathway.

“στέρησιν του δικαιώματος του εκλέγειν και της εγγραφής του ονόματος αυτού εις τον εκλογικόν κατάλογον διά περίοδον μη υπερβαίνουσαν τα επτά έτη”
§ view source
2026-06-17
ELIG.3Restoration of voting rightsWhere rights are lost (e.g., post-felony), is the procedure for restoration codified, with statutory deadlines and automatic restoration where applicable?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-17

Identification

20.0% · 1/5
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
ID.1Statutory groundingIf ID is required at any point in voting, is the requirement set in statute rather than regulation? If no ID is required, is that explicit in statute?1/1100.0%

The statute explicitly requires identity verification (verification of identity through exhibition of electoral booklet or identity card) before a ballot is issued to the voter. This ID requirement is set directly in the statute text (Article 65B, subsection 5(β)) rather than delegated to regulation or administrative discretion. The acceptable forms of ID are enumerated: electoral booklet or identity card.

“αφού εξακριβωθεί η ταυτότητα του εκλογέα με την επίδειξη εκλογικού βιβλιαρίου ή δελτίου ταυτότητας, δίδεται σε αυτόν ψηφοδέλτιο”
§ view source
2026-06-17
ID.2Enumerated acceptable IDsAre the acceptable ID forms exhaustively enumerated in statute, not left to administrator discretion?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-17
ID.3Free alternative IDIf government-issued ID is required, is a free state-issued ID available by statute to anyone who lacks one?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-17
ID.4At-polls cure procedureIs the cure procedure for a voter who arrives without ID (provisional ballot, affidavit, return-with-ID, signature match) defined in statute?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 31 addresses ballot counting procedures and invalidation of ballots (ψηφοδέλτια), not voter identification or at-polls cure procedures for voters without ID. The section details how ballot boxes are opened, votes counted, invalid ballots rejected, and results recorded—all post-voting administrative functions. There is no statutory text in this section concerning ID requirements for voters, provisional ballots, affidavits, return-with-ID procedures, or signature matching at the polling place.

§ view source
2026-06-17
ID.5Rejection appeal procedureIs the appeal procedure for a rejected ID (or rejected provisional ballot due to ID) codified in statute?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-17

Registration

0.0% · 0/7
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
REG.1Statutory registration deadlineIs the registration cutoff relative to election day defined by statute (not regulation or administrative directive)?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 60 addresses the Electoral Court's reporting procedure on unlawful acts and candidate disqualifications after hearing election petitions. It contains no registration deadline, registration cutoff, or registration procedure. It is procedurally about post-election review and reporting to the President, not about voter or candidate registration deadlines relative to election day.

§ view source
2026-06-17
REG.2Enumerated registration methodsAre the available registration methods (in-person, mail, online, motor-voter, automatic, same-day where applicable) exhaustively enumerated in statute?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: This section addresses apportionment of parliamentary seats by electoral district based on registered voter counts, not voter registration methods themselves. It contains no enumeration of registration procedures, mechanisms, or pathways. The criterion evaluates whether available registration methods are exhaustively enumerated in statute; this section does not address registration methodology at all.

§ view source
2026-06-17
REG.3Cure procedure for incomplete registrationDoes statute define a cure procedure when a registration is rejected as incomplete?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 12, which addressed applications for registration, deletion, or correction, has been deleted (marked '[Διαγράφηκε]'). No cure procedure for incomplete registration is defined in this section because the section itself no longer exists in operative law. Without substantive procedural text, there is no statutory cure mechanism to evaluate.

§ view source
2026-06-17
REG.4Rejection challenge rightIs the voter's right to challenge a rejected or removed registration codified in statute?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-17
REG.5Roll-maintenance criteria in statuteAre the criteria for removing voters from rolls (death, change of address, inactivity) defined in statute, not regulation?0/20.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-17
REG.6Pre-purge notice & cure periodIs a statutory notice-and-opportunity-to-cure required before a voter is removed from the rolls?0/10.0%

No matching sections in corpus.

no FTS match
2026-06-17

Roll Integrity

0.0% · 0/1
DatapointScoreRationale & evidenceSource
ROLL.1Voter-data security & breach notificationIs the data security regime for the voter registry (encryption requirements, breach notification, access logs) codified in statute?0/10.0%

No section in the FTS-surfaced candidates satisfies this criterion. Best signal: Article 65B governs the voting procedure for COVID-19-positive voters in the 2021 election but contains no provisions addressing voter data security, encryption requirements, breach notification procedures, or access logs for the voter registry. The section addresses voter eligibility verification, special mobile polling centers, and ballot procedures, but does not codify any data security regime. The statute explicitly states that the special electoral list "is not published" for data protection reasons, but provides no statutory framework for encryption, breach notification, access controls, or audit logging.

§ view source
2026-06-17

Voter Assistance

0.0% · 0/3

Voting Methods

0.0% · 0/6

Other methodologies for Cyprus